What if you found out your Special Education child had been taught by an uncertified teacher for the last few years? Under the laws of the State of Texas, a school district must notify parents of students in classrooms that have an uncertified teacher for a period of thirty days, telling the parent that the teacher is uncertified and that the parent has the option of obtaining a certified teacher for their child.
Certification of a teacher by the State Board of Education--SBEC----means that the teacher has been trained, is knowledgable about, and is qualified to teach the subjects he or she plan to teach. Some teacher-applicants take the teacher certification test many times before they pass it.
Other teacher-applicants take the certification test repeatedly, but are unable to ever pass it. With all the heavy emphasis on testing required by the state and federal governments, it is essential to have a teacher who is certified teaching your child.
But if your child had the misfortune to have been a student at Cranfills Gap ISD in 2007, your Special Education child would have been taught by an uncertified teacher, and none of your Special Education ARDS required by law would count. Your child would have been done a great disservice, and the school district and the teacher would be breaking the law.
This is exactly what happened in 2007 when Cranfills Gap ISD Special Education teacher Laura Rose had been teaching Special Education for several years without being certified to teach Special Education. One day, another Cranfills Gap ISD teacher, Science teacher Michelle Dubay, inadvertently discovered that Special Education teacher Laura Rose was not certified to teach Special Education.
When Dubay tried to bring the matter to Superintendent Carla Sigler's attention, a series of unexpected events developed. All Carla Sigler had to do was contact the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and get an emergency update for uncertified teacher Laura Rose.
Incredibly, rather than simply fix Laura Rose's illegal non-certification, Carla Sigler chose to suspend certified Science teacher Michelle Dubay with pay. Sigler then falsely accused, ostracized, and persecuted Michelle Dubay, and even went so far as to leave a threatening message on Dubay's answering machine.
After a school board meeting where Sigler had refused to discuss Dubay's contract, Sigler sent Dubay a letter stating that the school board had decided not to renew Dubay's contract. However, Michelle Dubay had been at that particular board meeting and knew no action had been taken on her contract, so she knew that was a lie. Subsequently, Michelle Dubay won a big settlement against Cranfills Gap ISD for the way it was all handled by Carla Sigler.
At the school, Sigler left uncertified teacher Laura Rose in the classroom teaching illegally. Sigler had removed certified and highly qualified teacher Michelle Dubay. Sigler had new uncertified teacher Sue Wernecke teaching Dubay's classes for the several months left in the school year--again, with no notice--as required by law--to parents that an uncertified teacher was teaching the class. Sue Wernecke then taught the entire 2007/2008 school year --this past year---teaching Michelle Dubay's classes under an emergency certificate but has never been certified to teach those classes.
During the 2006/2007 school year, my sister, Sue Lee, a longtime Cranfills Gap school board member, fought constantly but unsuccessfully to convince Carla Sigler and the Cranfills Gap School Board that teacher Doug Holmes by law had to have a Local Permit to teach Technology. Carla Sigler accused Sue Lee of bringing this up over and over for the sole purpose of harassing her, Carla Sigler.
After Sigler left the district in 2007, Cranfills Gap School Board President Kenny Wiese announced that by law DOUG HOLMES DOES NEED A PERMIT, just as Sue Lee had repeatedly told them. However, as recently as just a month ago, Doug Holmes still had no permit to teach Technology.
After talking to the school attorney a few weeks ago, current 2007/2008 Cranfills Gap ISD School Superintendent James Scott accepted Doug Holmes resignation, and then turned right around and hired Doug Holmes back as an at-will employee with the same pay, the same benefits, and the same teacher retirement eligibilty.
Now that's a great deal for Doug Holmes, but here's the kicker, Folks: All those Cranfills Gap students who took Doug Holmes' classes may not get credit for those classes unless they can pass an examination...all due to Doug Holmes not having the required local permit!
And that's a shame! It isn't the fault of the students, but rather the failure of Carla Sigler and the Cranfills Gap School Board members to care enough to make sure they are following the law. For one full year, it was repeatedly brought to their attention, but rather than check with the school attorney, they chose to ostracize Sue Lee, who knew the law when they did not. For another year, they knew for certain that Doug Holmes had to have a Local Permit, but allowed him to teach without one anyway. Apparently they did not care whether it would affect students or not.
So, tell me, would you let your kid go to Cranfills Gap School, where they don't know the law, don't care enough to find out the law, and then won't comply with the law?
35 comments:
I let my children go to Cranfills Gap ISD with no reservations. I would encourage any parent who wants his/her child to get a quality education in a small school setting to contact the school. The teachers and staff take care of my child as if he were their own. I love having him in a school that truly cares about him. You should check the TAKS scores from this year. They are great! That comes from great teachers, too.
To Another Norewgian: That is great that you are happy with the Cranfills Gap school. There are some teachers, esp. in elementary, at Cranfills Gap school, who are good teachers , treat kids right, mind their own business, and treat the students fairly and don't get involved in the politics there. Where do I find the scores you are talking about? Also, for the record and the sake of fairness, please state whether your kids were in the Gap School when Carla Sigler was there in 2006/2007 and state your opinion of Carla Sigler. Note: If you are a Sigler supporter, your opinion of the Cranfills Gap school is colored by your opinion of her, and your kids would be treated well and fairly--- in fact, favored over others-- if you are a known supporter of Carla Sigler. For an honest assessment of the school, one must know who the assessor truly is. At Cranfills Gap school-- as well as in the community--- it really does matter whether you supported Carla Sigler or did not support Carla Sigler.
To Another Norwegian: Please state what you thought of my motivational speech to the Cranfills Gap Seniors. The question YOU NEVER ANSWERED that I asked was what you felt should have happened last year to Sarah Sellers, who was not even sent to the office and rec'd no punishment whatsoever from Carla Sigler, though Sarah admitted starting the physical part of the fight--it does take TWO to fight and Sarah did take it to the physical level. I want to know if you think the fact that Sarah was favored over Kaitlan, while Kaitlan was crucified to the fullest extent--Sigler and the school board even breaking the law to do so---Do you think anything should have been done to Sarah or only to Kaitlan, as that is what occurred. KAITLAN HEAD WAS RAILROADED WHILE SARAH SELLERS WAS REWARDED. Would you think this was fair and the right thing if Kaitlan or Sarah either one were your child? Sarah was not innocent herself. It takes two to fight-- and it was a fight, as Sarah herself said. I want to see how fairly YOU would treat children, not just your own.
My opinion of Dr. Sigler doesn't matter one way or the other. I was a supporter of CGISD for years before she came and will be a supporter of CGISD for years to come. As far as the K/S situation from LAST YEAR: Just like you, I was not there to witness the so-called altercation between the girls. Like you, I was not privy to the displine doled out in the office. Like you, I did not hear the words come out of S's mouth about the whole deal. My opinion of what should or should not have happened to S is not important. That was the job of Dr. Sigler and then the school board. However, IT DOES NOT MATTER NOW. IT'S OVER. Banana, banana.
AH, BUT I DID HEAR SARAH'S VERY OWN WORDS, in her statement about the altercation (fight). You can also hear her words, as they are WRITTEN. Carla Sigler read Sarah's very own words outloud at the May 16th hearing for Kaitlan at the school, in front of a lot of people who then knew the truth after hearing Sarah's account of the fight--the truth being that Sarah struck the first blow and took the fight from words to fists. You--or anyone-- can hear Sarah's words yourself. All you have to do is a FREE Open Records request at the public taxpayer-funded school that your taxes pay for. But I don't think you want to hear Sarah's words--the truth. Then you would have to admit Kaitlan was railroaded and Sarah rewarded, and that the things done to Kaitlan were done illegally by Sigler and the school board in malicious retaliation against my sister by causing harm to her niece. How shameful--to harm a child to get even with someone. God have mercy on anyone who would do so! I also DO know NOTHING happened to Sarah. Sarah was favored over Kaitlan, the law was broken TWICE to harm Kaitlan, and, in the words of a Sigler supporter overheard down at Shelly's little feed store, "It will NEVER be over!" So maybe you need to be talking to those die-hard Sigler supporters, and not just me, to try bring resolution for what is turning out to be a tragedy for the school and the town.
You are living in a dream world if you think your opinion of Carla Sigler does not matter. One's opinion of Carla Sigler will FOREVER matter in Cranfill's Gap! You sound like a good parent--knowing what happened to others who did not support Carl Sigler, how can you leave your children at the Gap school if there is the slimmest chance they might be in harm's way? That alone tells me you are a Sigler supporter and probably think Sigler or the school board did not do anything wrong... In your eyes, Kaitlan got what she deserved and poor little Sarah did not need to be punished, even if she was fighting, too, and even if Sarah actually started the fight by hitting Kaitlan, and it is okay to break the law to be sure to punish one fighter (whose aunt we don't like!), but not the other fighter! God hates hypocrites and liars and those who mistreat children. What was done to Kaitlan was a shameful, disgraceful affair with lasting repercussions. But you are wise not to say anything unfavorable about Carla Sigler or her friends--the school and the town have ears, and you don't want to put your kids in harm's way. SOUNDS TO ME LIKE YOU ARE TRAPPED! So, in the words of corrupt lawbreaker Carla Sigler, here are some words of wisdom to live by: "BANANA, BANANA! POOP! POOP! "
Question for you, Another Norwegian: Where do I find the test scores you are bragging on?
To Another Norewegian: What did you think of my motivational speech to the Cranfills Gap Seniors, wishing them well on the Journey of Life?
The slimmest chance my child may be in harm's way? Are you crazy? How is my child in harm's way if I liked or didn't like Dr. Sigler? She's not here now and hasn't been for over a year now. Has there been a child harmed this year that I did not know about? I feel perfectly safe with my child in the hands of ANY of the teachers--elementary or high school--at the Gap.
Most parents would not take the chance you are willing to take that their child might be in harm's way if they or their family or friends do not support Carla Sigler. So, if you had no problems in school, you must be a Sigler supporter. Carla Sigler is still gleefully pulling the strings in Cranfills Gap. Proof of that is she and other adults manipulated children to finagle her "Coming Home" as the Guest Graduation Speaker for the Cranfills Gap High School. Obviously, your child wasn't one that was exposed to the vicious Gap teacher who hit little kids with a book, twisted their little arms behind their backs, and heaped verbal abuse on them, causing emotional distress. Obviously, your child was not one of those students harassed and threatened by other Gap students last year because they did not support Carla Sigler. (I have copies of threatening and harassing e-mails from those Gap students who support Sigler to those who did not support her--Why do you think so many kids left last year? They felt in danger!) Some of those kids who harassed and threatened other students last year are still there, as are their parents who support Sigler. Why would any sane person let their child be exposed to this? I am not the crazy one. BTW, you never did say where I can find the Gap Test scores you brag about. Also what comment of yours did I delete? I only delete personal attacks that I find offensive.
I found out the TAKS scores because my student attends the school, and I attended the awards assemblies when Commended Performance Awards were given to SEVERAL students. Since you don't have a student or any other family attending the school, I guess you'll have to wait until Aug. 1 when the results come out from the state. I am sure your sister heard Mr. Scott's report at the board meeting concerning scores. There were several tests that were passed with 100%.
What adults manipulated Sigler's coming back? And how did they go about doing it? Just wondering.
Could have been one or more of the many Sigler supporters in the school or the community--doesn't really matter--It was great that she got to come back! Banana? Banana? Poop? Poop?
Talking about scores and student ratings, I would think that with so small a student-teacher ratio, the Gap school would be rated Exemplary or at least Recognized all the time. Maybe it will be this year. Meridian Elementary, a school with a much higher student-teacher ratio has been rated Exemplary for several years now. Making sure the law is followed by having highly qualified and fully certified teachers in the classrooms should improve test scores and school ratings-- both State and Federal-- even more if they were good to begin with. What comment did you say I deleted?
Actually, I was told that having fewer students in the school makes it much more difficult to receive a high rating because just one failure can really hurt a small school. There are several articles on the net about this. If one class at the Gap has 5 students and one student fails, then they are immediately at an 80% pass rate. The class at Meridian might have 15 in a class and if one fails there they are at a 93% pass rate. Smaller numbers can really hurt small schools when it comes to ratings.
Not all of us were thrilled to see Dr. Sigler as the "speaker" at graduation. Some of us thought it was very inconsiderate. What about Mr. Scott's feelings? Several of us felt really bad for him. I was embarassed that we did that.
I was thinking of the smaller ratio being touted as a plus to a student, that they would receive one-on-one teaching, more than the bigger classes, then the Test scores would reflect that extra attention one would not get in a larger class. It does make sense that one student failing could drastically lower the entire ratings in the smaller class. The students would still get the grade they earned, but overall, it could be down because of the one failing student.
I rather enjoyed the graduation ceremony. It was nice to get to put a face to some of the many folks I have talked to or about in my blog. Cindy Wiese is a very pretty lady, and others seemed pretty classy as well. Too bad we can't go back to the friendly way it used to be, but as a Sigler supporter at Shelly's little store so succinctly put it, "Too much has happened. It will never be over!" And, sadly, I do believe they spoke the truth.
Just wanted to clear up something about graduation speakers. The senior class voted on their speaker just as they have done for years. They chose someone who was special to them or had a positive impact on their lives. Mr. Scott approved the choice. I don't think they planned it to embarrass anyone. I don't think a bunch of 18-year-olds thought about it that hard! lol
What I heard from several Gap students themselves was it came about when it was suggested by one student who was a big Sigler fan and that only a few students got the chance to vote on it--that it was a done deal without full input from all the students---maybe Sigler or another adult suggested it or the student thought it up on their own -----not that it matters. If I were a student at the Cranfills Gap school and wanted to finish my senior year without being threatened, harassed or perhaps illegally banned from graduation on a trumped up charge, I would have said: Whatever! Whoever you want as speaker is fine with me! Get the Three Stooges if you want to..I'm not going to make any waves. Actually, it was good that Sigler came and gave us those unique life-changing words of wisdom to live by. What were they again? Oh, yes, they were: Banana? Banana? Poop? Poop?
Wrong. All of the seniors voted. All 17 of them. My son's best friend was one of them. It was a majority vote--just like in our society. No one was railroaded. Did some of them not care? Probably. There are students in high schools everywhere who don't care what goes on as long as they don't have to do anything. No one was afraid of not graduating this year (unless they happened not to pass Mr. Cox's final exam in Economics!!--It was hard)
We have differences of opinion and fact on this matter which is really not important. Kids are pretty smart, and sometimes just going along with the crowd--whatever they want=whether you agree with them or not--is not worth the risk that you will be harassed, threatened, or worse because you happen not to agree with them...in most schools, that is called "caving to peer pressure". Some schools call the harassment, threats and worse "Being Bullied". In Cranfills Gap, it is called "Go along to get along, as History could repeat itself"---meaning that you need to be wise enough not to set yourself up for possible harassment, threats, or worse, as History really does have a tendency to repeat itself, esp when many of the major players in last year's graduation fiasco and who still back Carla Sigler are still in place. But, hey, everyone survived the guest speaker and the graduation ceremony, right? Having a wonderful graduation experience is a privilege, not a right, remember? Now, all the students still left to graduate at the Gap School just need to make sure they are on the right side of the issue--or at least pretend to be-- until they are able to make it out of that school. Be careful what you say, and be careful what you do. The halls and the walls have ears and eyes! Sigler supporters are everywhere and they are watching for the slightest hint of betrayal of their beloved leader. Oh, my God, that is a perfect description of Dear Leader Hitler and Nazi Germany!!!!!!! LOL
I did notice one thing at the graduation. To my knowledge, Carla Sigler did not give a single frontal-hug or kiss any male students on the neck. Hooray! I think she got the message that in Texas, we don't treat our students so inappropriately or unprofessionally. She can do whatever she wants to in Alaska, but most Texas parents care about who touches their children in inappropriate ways. It is a fact that those you would never suspect sometimes turn out to be the worst sexual predator. There are usually signs, and most people would put a stop instantly to even a hint of inappropriateness toward a student, boy or girl. But last year, scales must have been on the eyes of beholders at the Gap school for them to not see how inappropriate and possibly sexually predatory--not to say very unprofessional--it was of Carla Sigler to bestow full-frontal hugs and kisses to student's necks, especially male students. All I can figure is those folks were receiving some type of benefit from her and chose to remain silent, not choosing to protect the children. As a parent of three and grandparent of seven, WHY no one spoke out against her for it will always be extremely hard for me to understand. She was certainly wise not to engage in such behavior at the Gap graduation ceremony, as that stranger sitting next to you or standing along the wall could have been a TEA observer, as it was known for some time she was to be the speaker. Yep, she is one smart woman! Banana? Banana? Poop? Poop?
Really, is this continued negativity really needed? Why don't you just leave people in the Gap alone and let them move on. It's hard for things to be gotten over when people like you won't allow it to be forgotten. If you are really concerned about these kids, and you really care about the well being of children, why are you trying to hurt a school that these kids love? Does everyone agree on the whole issue from last year? No. But that's ok. We can agree to disagree and move on from it. However, that's never going to happen if people like you continue these antics. I am not trying to be mean or rude or anything like that. You and I have had our disagreements on here before, but I'm past all that. There are more important things in life to concentrate on. If Carla wants to consider C.G. home, that's fine. If she wants to come home to visit those that she considers friends/family, that's fine. Nowhere does it say she can't. But that's her choice to make. She's not asking anyone to accept her or not. She doesn't expect everyone to embrace her with open arms. That's fine as well. But the fact remains that it is truly time to move on from all of this and that is only going to happen if people like you and anyone else who is still stewing over this, on either "side", decides to move on and start living in the present and not in the past.
Mercy? Are you asking for mercy? Where was the mercy for Kaitlan? No, it's not okay.
I don't think fedup8208 said anything about 'asking for mercy'.
Tell me something honestly. What is it you and Sue want? It's obvious you are out to do the most damage you two can. You keep slamming Sue Wernecke, Laura Rose, and Doug Holmes. Have you ever met these three people? You stated that after seeing some of the people at Gap's graduation that you thought they had class. So do those three. I have know Laura and Doug for quite a while. Why are you out to destroy them?
I never said anything about mercy. Where did you get that? All I asked was if this continued behavior is really needed. From what I hear Kaitlan has moved on and has a whole other life she is living and dealing with each day, as we all do. You constantly refer to God and the Bible in your postings. Don't you think it's time to follow some of His teachings and forgive and move on? I don't expect you'll ever forget, as none of us will. But it is time to move on from this and focus on the important things happening now. Not what has happened in the past, things that aren't going to change. That's all I meant. I never asked you for mercy.
I don't know what my sister wants--why don't you ask her? We don't discuss it, because my brother and I disagree with her, and it only causes hard feelings to discuss it. I can still love my sister and enjoy her company, even if I vehemently disagree with her. I WOULD like to see the law followed in the Cranfills Gap school, for a change. Actions have consequences. Due to Carla Sigler's actions and the actions of the Cranfills Gap School Board, Kaitlan is not living the life she should be living. But she has survived, and so will all of you and your children. Your children are no better than anyone else's, and you will all be okay. Kaitlan is okay, so you will be, too, right? And it won't do you any good to ask for mercy, because you are not going to get it. Kaitlan did not get mercy, and neither will any of the liars, lawbreakers, and the hypocrites in Cranfills Gap.
And there will especially NEVER be any mercy for the despicable Carla Sigler.
You just ignore comments when you respond to them don't you? I said I never asked for mercy. Where did you get that?
According to the New World Dictionary of American English, Third College Edition: MERCY: (Noun) 1. A refraining from harming or punishing offenders, enemies, or persons in one's power, etc. 2. Kindness in excess of what may be expected or demanded by fairness. 3. Forbearance and compassion. 4. A disposition to forgive, pity, or be kind. 5. Kind or compassionate treatment. Synonyms of mercy: clemency, charity, leniency. Antonyms of mercy: CRUELTY , SEVERITY
KAITLAN WAS NOT SHOWN MERCY--ONLY CRUELTY AND SEVERITY BY CARLA SIGLER AND CRANFILLS GAP SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS Kenny Wiese, Jeff Rose, Kathie Witte, Shelly Stuart, Virgil Tindall, and Ray Sorrels.
So if you are not asking for mercy, what are you asking for?
Go back and read my first entry. Then you'll see that I'm not asking for anything. I just asked you if this was all really needed. What do you expect to change or gain by continuing to be so rude to people you have admitted you've never met or that you only met briefly this weekend?
If it wasn't necessary, I would not be doing it. You ARE asking for something..for me to stop...why is that so hard for you to say? Sigler and the school board were asked to stop and just follow the law, but instead they broke it many times and they darn sure did not stop. As I said, I have a vested interest in the child Kaitlan and what happens to her--in the past, the present, and the future.
Regarding God and the Bible, how do you know I am not Jewish and don't believe in turning the other cheek, as those who believe in Jesus Christ do? What if I beleive in an eye-for-an-eye, like the Old Testament says. What if I believe that God can smite your enemies if you ask him to, just as King David asks in Psalms? If you know your Bible, you will know that God is an angry, vengeful God. God gives Mercy, Jesus gives Forgiveness, among other things. You notice the saying is not Jesus will get you for that. The saying is GOD will get you for that.
As for other superintendents through the years at the Gap school, Henry Lind was a plain old con man and thief--a crook--but seemed to do a good job of running the school, except for that one little detail. Murray Wise was incompetent but a nice enough guy. The only Supt who went out of their way to purposely harm a student was Carla Sigler. Sue Lee was exposing Carla Sigler for what she was, as well as all the lawbreaking Carla Sigler was doing. When Kaitlan, Sue's niece, and Sarah got into their fight, Carla Sigler could not resist the temptation to crucify Kaitlan, a child and student under her authority, to hurt Sue Lee. Why was nothing done to Sarah? State law and the Gap Code of Conduct both both call for all parties involved in a fight--whether they started it or not--to receive punishment, not to exceed THREE DAYS suspension. Sarah didn't even go to the office. Kaitlan received one day suspension from Carla Sigler, came back the next day, sat in the same classroom as Sarah & took a Test. Carla Sigler then sent Kaitlan home and Sarah left with all the classmates but Kaitlan to go on the Senior Trip for four days. Sigler escaled Kaitlan's punishment to THIRTEEN SCHOOL DAYS of suspension--illegal under the law and the Gap Code of Conduct. Carla Sigler knew that was illegal, but did it anyway..to get even with Sue Lee. So don't give me that crap abut Carla Sigler Never did anything she knew would hurt a student. The indisputable facts prove otherwise. In Kaitlan's case, Carla Sigler did everything she could to harm Kaitlan, child and student under her authprity. Despicable and indefensible.
I was pleased to see so many people at the Gap graduation the other night. Probably three hundred or more were there. I have attended Gap graduations thru the years when forty people were a big crowd. Some years the graduating seniors numbered only six or seven, usually hovering around ten or twelve..never very big classes. So seventeen seniors is quite an accomplishment. It was also really nice to be able to vist with Bosque County Sheriff's Deputy, Officer David Pack, whom I have always miscalled "Danny". (I do the same thing with many people's names, usually someone I don't see very often and am not thinking of them right at that moment...--I can "see" the "D" and know their name starts with that letter but is it David or Danny, James or Jason, or Mevin or Marvin? My students always get a kick out of me often miscalling them, and don't mind a bit as they know I know who they are! I also miscall my kids and grandkids, too!) Anyway, as I said, it was nice to get the opportunity to talk with David again. I actually met David last August at Kaitlan's court hearing where the Judge dropped all charges (trumped up by Sigler and friends) as per the recommendation of the two deputy sheriffs who investigated and by the County Attorney. Everyone said it should not have gone that far, that it was all blown way out of proportion, and that charges should have been filed against Sarah by Kaitlan for fighting, too--Kaitlan refused to do that! But as much trouble for Kaitlan as possible was what Carla Sigler and her friends wanted, so they did it anyway. That is where I had the chance to meet "Danny". It was good to see him again. My sister Sue Lee and former Cranfills Gap Science teacher Michelle Dubay--who sat with Sue and I during the graduation--also enjoyed chatting with him again. Always good to see and get to visit with our fine young lawmen!
The Gap School Board could have stopped Carla Sigler's persecution of Kaitlan Head. But, NO, they chose to disregard legal advice from the legal expert-- the $4000 attorney, John Cullar, a specialist in Education Law --who knows the law upside down, sideways, and every which way-- retained by Kaitlan's father. The school attorney had been purposely kept away from the meeting by Carla Sigler. The Board chose to continue breaking the law, and then broke the law even more--Open Meetings Act--and eventually later lied to the Atty Gen's office about doing so. My God, that town is full of liars, lawbreakers, and hypocrites and downright mean people who won't stop at hurting children to get even! Perhaps Carla Sigler used the last two school board members, Virgil Tindall and Ray Sorrels, who came on board at last minute. I personally think there was a conspiracy between some of the board members who did not like Sue Lee as a result of continually butting heads with Sue over the Gap School not following the law, over the illegal policies of Carla Sigler, over the incompetency of Carla Sigler, as well as over lying, arrogant Carla Sigler herself. I have often wondered if Carla Sigler was blackmailing some of the board members--especially the men to whom she loved to give her hot wet kisses on the neck--- to get them to do her bidding.. that or she was a master manipulator of people--a sleazy con artist-- who gained their trust, then used them to her advantage. No, don't let anyone tell you the Cranfills Gap School Board is innocent of purposely harming a child. They knew better and did it anyway. No excuse for it--they wanted to harm the child to hurt the adult!!!! It might have been Carla Sigler's idea to break the law to harm a child, but Cranfills Gap School Board members Kenny Wiese, Jeff Rose, Kathie Witte, Shelly Stuart, Virgil Tindall, and Ray Sorrels willingly and gladly went right along with it! Again, despicable and indefensible!
By law, a student cannot be sent to DAEP on a first offense for fighting. KAITLAN HEAD--Valedictorian, Honor Student, Homecoming Queen--HAD NO FIRST OFFENSE-- in fact, KAITLAN HEAD HAD NO DISCIPLINARY RECORD At ALL. So, by law, Kaitlan Head could not be sent to DAEP, but Carla Sigler sent her anyway. Carla Sigler told Kaitlan Head she would be arrested if she even TRIED to come on the Cranfills Gap School grounds. Why? CARLA SIGLER WANTED TO PURPOSELY HARM A CHILD TO GET EVEN WITH AN ADULT. SHAMEFUL! DESPICABLE! And if you can't see that, you are as shameful and despicable as Carla Sigler is. The proof is indisputable. SHAMEFUL! DESPICABLE! Shameful and despicable also apply to Gap school board members (Kenny Wiese, Jeff Rose, Kathie Witte, Shelly Stuart, Virgil Tindall, and Ray Sorrels) who allowed it to happen. They knew it was not legal--my God, there's one of the top education attorneys in the state of Texas standing right in front of them, repeatedly telling them that if they do this, they will be breaking the law, and they do it anyway? The School Board knew exactly what they were doing. Carla Sigler knew exactly what she and the School Board were doing. They all knew they were causing harm illegally to a child, and they still did it anyway! Don't give me that crap that Carla Sigler Never did anything to purposely harm a child. THAT IS A LIE! Don't give me that crap that Cranfills Gap School Board members Never did anything to purposely harm a child. THAT IS A LIE! Why did they purposely harm a child? For one of the oldest reasons on Earth--REVENGE--TO GET EVEN WITH ANOTHER HUMAN BEING--AND THEY HARMED A CHILD to do it. SHAMEFUL, DESPICABLE, And UNFORGETTABLE!
Post a Comment