Recently received legal documentation shows conflicting testimony about the incident with the 2007 Cranfills Gap valedictorian, my niece, Kaitlan Head, and the 2007 Cranfills Gap salutatorian, Sarah Sellers, on May 9th, 2007, that resulted in the valedictorian being banned from campus and her own graduation. Being in education myself, I have always wondered about involvement in that incident of the teacher, Sharla Knippa.
According to Sharla Knippa's notarized statement about the incident, she--- Sharla Knippa, the teacher in charge of the class--- LEFT THE ROOM WHEN THE INCIDENT STARTED! She states: ".....while I had gone to get Dr. Sigler when the situation began....."! Having been in many teacher trainings, I can assure you one of the first things one is taught is that a teacher NEVER leaves the room without another adult watching the class, especially if there is a situation that might escalate. This would be especially true if the teacher was aware an incident or situation was beginning. My God, what was this incompetent woman-- this teacher-- Sharla Knippa, thinking? From her statement, it is clear she was thinking that a situation is beginning, so I have to leave the room to find the superintendent! If that was the case, this very incompetent woman should be fired and not allowed to be in charge of any students ever again! What the teacher should do in an escalating situation is call for assistance over the intercom system--if you don't have an intercom system, you send another student for assistance---you don't leave the room when a situation is developing, when anything could happen, with obvious passions running high--that is incomprehensible and totally unacceptable behavior by anyone in charge of students!
. Sharla Knippa's statement does not state that she-- the teacher-- even witnessed the incident between the valedictorian and the salutatorian---it appears from her notarized statement that she was not even in the room when the incident occurred. This would fit with statements from the tape-recorded hearing for Kaitlan on May 16th, 2007, where Sharla Knippa can be heard on the tape saying that no one had ever asked her what happened---was it because she was not in the room and did NOT KNOW what happened? Superintendent Carla Sigler, reading the statement of salutatorian Sarah Sellers, states --on the tape-- a different account of happenings that day than Sharla Knippa's account in her statement. SOMEONE IS LYING!!!!!!
I also have a problem with the document itself. The document appears to be written in the handwriting of Carla Sigler, not Sharla Knippa. It is also appears to be signed in Carla Sigler's handwriting.. Why would Carla Sigler hand-write or sign Sharla Knippa's statement about the incident? Perhaps I am mistaken, but this documentation strongly suggests that Sharla Knippa's statement was written by Carla Sigler, not by Sharla Knippa. I guess this is a mystery Kaitlan's attorney is going to have to investigate.
And guess what? Handwritten below the statement is the signature, "Mrs. Sharla Knippa" and the date, "May 9th, 2007"-----however, NEITHER IS NOTARIZED! The statement, signature, and date are all the same handwriting, appearing to be that of Carla Sigler. And guess what again?!!! Below that unnotarized signature and date is a SECOND signature and date---"Mrs. Sharla Knippa, May 22nd, 2007", which IS NOTARIZED, and the handwriting appears different--or is it? Janet Cox, Cranfill's Gap Secretary notarized this second signature on May 22nd, 2007. Did Carla Sigler write the statement of Sharla Knippa, date it May 9th, and at a later date, May 22nd, had Sharla Knippa sign and date it, and notarize-- what, the statement, or Sharla Knippa's signature? Or did Sharla Knippa never sign it--would that be Sharla's initials at the top of one page--in a different handwriting--or is it? Very strange indeed!
And yet not so strange, when you consider the choice the teacher would have had to make when presented with this document--already written in the superintendent's own handwriting, even the teacher's signature already written there by Carla Sigler. So, does the teacher say --Wait a minute, I didn't write that statement, it isn't even in my handwriting, and that is not my signature--and maybe I wasn't even in the room--- so how can I make a statement about something I did not witness--but if I point that out, she is my boss, and it may mean I lose my job? No, the teacher probably signs the statement AS-IS and gets to keep her job, no matter that it is not a true statement and harm will purposely be done to a student.
Such a situation as stated above is not beyond the pale, as instances of teachers and school employees being threatened by Superintendent Carla Sigler with job loss or negative consequences if they spoke out against injustices or disagreed with her on issues have come to light recently--people are no longer afraid to speak out since she has moved on. And there were a few brave and courageous souls who did stand up and speak out against her actions while she was their boss...for that, many were punished, like Carol Nelson, the custodian fired and denied her health insurance-- though she had already paid for it-- when Dr. Carla Sigler maliciously backdated her paperwork so Carol could not get her paid-for health insurance without filing a lawsuit. Vindictive things like that, done in retaliation if she perceived a slight against her or her friends, were the norm at the Cranfill's Gap school. No one who spoke out against her went unpunished, whether by a smear campaign you might not even know about until much later, or actual outright retaliation that she wanted you to know she was responsible for! There was the Cranfill's Gap school secretary, Sandy McMahan, forced from her job when --out of the blue-- Superintendent Sigler told Sandy that she had accepted Sandy's resignation --only Sandy had never resigned or indicated she was resigning--in fact, Sandy loved her job and was very good at it....so Carla Sigler could give the job to Janet Cox, aunt of Kathie Witte, school board member and Carla's best friend.
In my opinion, the truth was purposely not told and documentation was "manufactured" and "doctored" -- by Dr.Carla Sigler -- (Sigler preferred to be called Dr. Sigler and signed most documentation "Dr. Carla Sigler"-- even though her Phd was considered a fake in Texas and many other states, as it was from a diploma mill in California, though she failed to disclose that when she was hired) to build a case against the niece of her perceived foe, school board member Sue Lee. I don't think Carla Sigler at first realized that the valedictorian was Sue Lee's niece--hence, the original, correct, and appropriate punishment of only one day suspension from school for Kaitlan--- however, once the connection to Sue Lee was made, Carla Sigler's intention became to inflict-- with malice-- as much harm as possible to the valedictorian, a child and student under her authority, for thepurpose of retaliation against Sue Lee.
In my opinion, Carla Sigler was possibly assisted in this retaliation effort by some, if not all, of the other school board members. These Cranfill's Gap school board members --Kenny Wiese, Jeff Rose, Kathie Witte, Shelly Stuart, Virgil Tindall, and Jackie Ray Sorrels--along with Dr. Carla Sigler, the former superintendent--- --are currently being investigated by the Bosque County District Attorney and the Texas Education Agency for violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act at the May 25th, 2007, school board meeting. That meeting was held to determine whether or not the valedictorian would be allowed to get her diploma, graduate, and participate in graduation. ( Kaitlan's classmates had been told that Kaitlan would be able to graduate, but not walk the stage on graduation night --another lie told by Superintendent Carla Sigler.) The valedictorian was allowed to have her diploma, scholarships, and to graduate--without spending almost $4,000 for attorney John Cullar of Waco, Kaitlan would not have been allowed to graduate. The attorney had to force a special board meeting just to make them discuss Kaitlan's appeal of Sigler's decision before the graduation date. However, the valedictorian remained banned from campus and was not allowed to participate in her graduation ceremony --a decision by the school board allegedly based upon the illegal introduction of alleged new evidence by the superintendent, Dr. Carla Sigler, during allegedly illegal closed sessions.
Superintendent Carla Sigler did achieve her goal of retaliation against her perceived foe, Sue Lee, through malicious actions against Sue's niece, Kaitlan Head, the valedictorian. That entire fiasco was only one of many occurrences where students---children under her authority-- were harmed or could have been harmed--as a result of her actions or inactions.
As I understand it, in one incident, a seven year-old girl, a second grader, was injured in the gym early one morning by older students--allegedly, there was no adult supervision at the time of this incidence. The child's leg swelled to twice its normal size. Cranfill's Gap is too small to have an on-site nurse and relies on the visiting nurse. As I understand it, the superintendent,Dr. Carla Sigler, iced the leg all day long and told the student to try to walk on it as that would make the swelling go down. The student's parents were not notified of the incident or the child's injury. At 5:30pm, the student was carried from the school bus to the door of the student's home by the bus driver. At that time, the horrified parents rushed the child to the Clifton Emergency Room where doctors determined that the student had a broken leg--a painful hairline fracture. This little girl had suffered needless great pain all day long! The parents went to theCranfill's Gap school the next day, accompanied by deputy sheriffs, to find out what had happened. (Many folks by now were aware that Carla Sigler might call the sheriff if you went to school upset over something and wanting to discuss it--she might tell the sheriff that YOU were the problem and YOU might be arrested.) Allegedly, Dr. Sigler's response was --well, the injury had been iced all day! To say the least, this child is no longer a student at Cranfill's Gap.
Another little girl was left alone in the school building after school --after the After-School Program-- for over three hours, as her parents, thinking the worst, frantically searched for her. When it was suggested to Dr. Carla Sigler that safeguards be put in place to prevent this from happening again, Dr. Sigler allegedly replied --Well, nothing happened did it? --and no changes were made to ensure the safety of the students.
It was incidences like these, as well as problems with some of the Cranfill's Gap teachers that were supposedly being resolved by Dr. Carla Sigler, that compelled so many parents to withdraw their children from the Cranfill's Gap school district in the 2006-2007 school year. If this is the way students-- mere children-- are treated, can you blame them? I would do the same if problems were not resolved-- or if I felt my child might not be as safe as they could be-- or that my child might not be treated for an injury in a timely and appropriate manner-- or that some students were favored over others and received preferential treatment (as when Justin Witte-- son of Carla Sigler's best friend school board member Kathie Witte-- was given the Academic Achievement Award when his grades ranked FOURTH in the class, and there was no mention of the valedictorian or thesalutatorian at the Awards Banquet which is for recognition of academic achievement ), etcetera. Not including the ten seniors who graduated, almost thirty students left the district last year. Not all students left on account of problems with the school, teachers, or Dr. Sigler --however, it is certain that an unusually high percentage of those who left did depart for those very reasons.
A few more students have enrolled, but the district is teetering on the fine line for possible loss of state funding as a result of extremely low enrollment. It would be ironic, and quite sad, if there were no school--and thus, no jobs and no town--as a result of the incompetency and personal agendas by Dr. Carla Sigler and her supporters. I believe that is a distinct possiblity. I believe that actions have consequences, and negative actions have negative consequences. I also believe that the incompetent and despicable actions of Carla Sigler and her lingering stench on the school and the town are having totally unintended and totally unexpected negative consequences What a shame for Cranfills Gap school and town.